
Fenomena Bias Politik Media Sosial dalam Polarisasi selama Pemiliham Umum Presiden 2024
Abstract
Penelitian ini menguraikan mengenai algoritma rekomendasi dalam media sosial yang mempersonalisasi tampilan konten yang dilihat oleh penggunanya. Personalisasi itu kemudian menciptakan fenomena filter bubble bagi penggunanya. Perilaku pengguna yang juga cenderung memilih konten atau narasi itu menciptakan echo chamber. Metode yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah kualitatif deskriptif yang menindaklanjuti penelitian-penelitian sebelumnya untuk menjelaskan mengenai filter bubble, echo chamber, dan propaganda di media sosial. Dengan menganalisis konten dan social network analysis (SNA) dari platform Twitter (X), terlihat bahwa pada Pemilihan Presiden Indonesia, kombinasi filter bubble dan echo chamber ini menjadi lahan subur untuk penyebaran propaganda yang menguatkan polarisasi antar pendukung di media sosial.
References
Agarwal, N., & Liu, H. (2009). Modeling and Data Mining in Blogosphere. Springer.
Ali, D. J., & Eriyanto. (2021, March). Political Polarization and Selective Exposure of Social Media Users in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, 24(3), 268-283.
Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to Ideologically Diverse News and Opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130-1132.
Barbera, P. (2015). Birds of the Same Feather Tweet Together: Bayesian Ideal Point Estimation Using Twitter Data. Political Analysis, 23(1), 76-91.
Barisione, M., & Ceron, A. (2017). A Digital Movement of Opinion? Contesting Austerity Through Social media. In M. Barisione, & A. (. Michailidou, Social Media and European Politics: Rethinking Power and Legitimacy in the Digital Era (pp. 89-118). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Beam, M. A. (2013, July 31). Automation the News: How Personalized News Recomendeer System Design Choices Impact News Reception. Communication Research, 41(8), 1019-1041.
Bjola, C. (2017). Propaganda in the Digital Age. Globar Affairs, 3(3), 189-191.
Bruns, A., & Burgess, J. (2012, March 22). Researching News Discussion on Twitter, New Methodologies. Journalism Studies, 13(5-6), 801-814.
Budd, R. W., Thorp, R. K., & Donohew, L. (1967). Content Analysis of Communications. New York: Macmillan.
Cinelli, M., Morales, G. D., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W., & Starnini, M. (2021). The Echo Chamber Effect on Social Media. In A. Underdal (Ed.), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 118 No.9, pp. 1-8. PNAS.
Da San Martino, G., Cresci, S., Barron-Cedeno, A., Yu, S., Di Pietro, R., & Nakov, P. (2020). A Survey on Computational Propaganda Detection. Twenty Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Seventeenth Pacific Rim International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 4826-4832). International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence.
Ellul, J. (1973). Propaganda: The Formation of Men's Attitudes. New York: Vintage Books.
Fahmi, I. (2019, January 11). Analisis Cyber Troops: Jokowi vs Prabowo. (Drone Emprit) Retrieved May 2025, from Drone Emprit Pers: http://pers.droneemprit.id.
Fahmi, I. (2019, April 1). Membandingkan Kampanye Jokowi-Maruf Amin dan Prabowo-Sandi. (Drone Emprit) Retrieved May 2025, from Drone Emprit Pers: https://pers.droneemprit.id/
Fahmi, I. (2019, July 14). Rekonsiliasi, Cluster yang Tertukar, dan Neo-Polarization. (Drone Emprit) Retrieved May 2025, from Drone Emprit Pers: https://pers.droneemprit.id
Fahmi, I. (2024, February 4). Analisis Debat Kelima Capres Pemilu 2024. (Drone Emprit) Retrieved May 2025, from Drone Emprit Pers: https://pers.droneemprit.id
Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M. (2016, March 22). Filter Bubbles. Echo Chambers, and Online News Consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 298-320.
Garimella, V. R., & Weber, I. (2017). A Long-Term Analysis of Polarization on Twitter∗. Proceeding of the Eleventh International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 11, pp. 528-531. Quebec.
Jalli, N., & Idris, I. (2024). Misguided Democracy in Malaysia and Indonesia: Digital Propaganda in Southeast Asia. Petaling Jaya: Strategic Information and Research Development Centre.
Jowett, G. S., & O'Donnel, V. (2018). Propaganda and Persuasion. Sage Publications.
Kubin, E., & von Sikorski, C. (2021, September 2021). The Role of (Social) Media in Political Polarization: A Systematic Review. Annals of the International Communication Association, 45(3), 188-206.
Lee, A. M., & Lee, E. B. (1939). The Fine Art of Propaganda: A Study of Father Coughlin's Speeches. New York: Brace and Co.
Lim, M. (2017, June). Freedom to hate: social media, algorithmic enclaves, and the rise of tribal nationalism in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 49(2), 411-427.
O'Connor, C., & Weatherall, J. O. (2019). The Social Media Propaganda Problem Is Worse Than You Think. Issues in Science and Technology, Vol.36 No.1, 30-32.
Pariser, E. (2011). The Filter Bubble: What the Internet is Hiding from You. New York: Penguin Press.
Sastropoetro, S. (1983). Propaganda Salah Satu Bentuk Komunikasi Massa. Bandung: Penerbit Alumni.
Sunstein, C. R. (2018). #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Spohr, D. (2017). Fake News and Ideological Polarization: Filter Bubbles and Selective Exposure on Social Media. Business Information Review, 34(3), 150-160.
Tucker, J. A., Guess, A., Barbera, P., Vaccari, C., Siegel, A., Sanovich, S., . . . Nyhan, B. (2018, March 19). Social Media, Political Polarization, and Political Disinformation: A Review of the Scientific Literature. William - Flora Hewlett Founcation, Communication, Media, Social and Policy Studies. Elsevier.
van Dijck, J. (2011). Tracing Twiter - The Rise of a Microblogging Platform. International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics, 333-348.
Wilcox, D. R. (2005). Propaganda, the Press and Conflict: The Gulf War and Kosovo. New York: Routledge.
Wijayanto, & Berenschot, W. (2024). Cybertroops and Public Opinion Manipulation Through Social Media in Indonesia. Centre for Strategic and International Studies, Politics and Social Change. Jakarta: CSIS.
Yang, G. (2016, August 11). Narrative Agency in Hashtag Activism: The Case of #BlacLivesMatter. Media and Communication, 4(4), 13-17.
Zuchdi, D., & Afifah, W. (2019). Analisis Konten, Etnografi & Grounded Theory, dan Hermeneutika dalam Penelitian. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.25008/wartaiski.v8i1.371
Article Metrics:
Abstract Views - 7
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Cavin Rubenstein Manuputty

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Indexed by:




Copyright of Jurnal Warta Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia (p-ISSN : 0853-4470)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Sekretariat Redaksi JURNAL WARTA Ikatan Sarjana Komunikasi Indonesia (ISKI)
Gedung Dewan Pers, Lt 5
Jl. Kebon Sirih No. 32-34, Jakarta 10110 – Indonesia
Contact Person :